Summary
• Benchmarking: Social Enterprise UK had commissioned “The State of Social Enterprise Survey 2013” which provides data on performance of SEs in the UK.
• SE Definition: The increased awareness of entrepreneurs on the brand value of “SE” triggers the academic effort on defining the sufficient conditions, instead of only necessary conditions, on what is a SE to avoid the abuse of the SE label. According to Professor Filipe Santos of INSEAD, social entrepreneurs should generate positive externalities benefiting the powerless community through sustainable solutions based on empowerment.
• Empowerment: Providing a job to the jobless is an empowerment.
• Sustainable solution: The SEs funded by 3E has a median life of 9.3 years, as compared the median life of 4 years of the US commercial enterprises. So 3E Project achieves a much higher sustainability relatively.
• Benefit on Workfare to the Powerless: Each grant dollar generates 77.4 cents/year of workfare for the people with disability. Over the 9.3 years, the total workfare is 7.2 dollars. That is, one dollar grant results to 7.2 dollars workfare.
• Benefit on Social Costs: The comparison between sheltered workshop and the SE portfolio in Stewards Ltd, a Christian Charity Organization (hereafter Stewards), reflect the significant difference in cost-effectiveness if only counting the workfare. However, social enterprises cannot help those in severe disability. So, there is a limit on social enterprise application.
• Recommendation: Hong Kong government has done a good job in designing and running funding schemes to incubate social entrepreneurship, but not a good job in evaluating and promoting its own achievements. The evaluation and marketing job should be revised to increase the return-on-investment of the marketing dollars.